Anyway, since the building is almost done (I found my optimism again), I thought it might be nice for my fellow sidecar enthusiasts to summarize the story of the building of SilberWolf. Let's go back in time and see where it all started...
Let's go back in time and see where it all started...
It became obvious in the beginning that there are no limits to what kind of sidecar to built. The only limiting factors might be my wallet and time. It was all about
Decisions .... Decisions ... Decisions
April 2012 - the first question: Which bike to choose for the sidecar R100GSPD or R1150GSA?
At that time I owned a R100GSPD with a sidecar and a R1200GSA.
The R1200GSA was instantly out of the race. I had one as a rental bike in NZ in 2011. After a day's ride we stopped at our hotel and when I wanted to start the bike again it did not do anything. It was also not possible to jump-start the bike. Obviously the CAN-bus is very sensitive when it comes to the battery voltage and does not allow starting the bike unless the voltage is within a certain range. Sorry BMW, this bike is not made for adventures with no service station around for hundreds of kilometres.
Back to the R100GSPD. The way this bike was built, it was only good for asphalt streets and easy gravel roads – nothing for a little more heavier terrain. Neither was it suitable for carrying all the dogs and our luggage for this journey. A new frame and a new boat were required one way or the other – so its all about the bike itself: to buy a used R1150GSA or to use my R100GSPD.
There would have been some work needed to make the PD ready to go (generator, ignition, clutch, kardan, front fork, back tyre with new brake and size for car tyre, smaller first gear). If I would buy a R1150GSA, I would also need to do some modifications (clutch, rear shock, front fork, remove ABS, exchange end-drive from 850, buy a tester device for ignition, exhaust pipe). I had both bikes for many years and they served me both well, so it was a tough decision. However the advantage with the 1150 would be more power, injection (ok - also a disadvantage due to electronics), newer bike and a much (much!!!) better sitting position. Those were the factors which lead to the decision to go ahead with a R1150GS Adventure.
The next question was which one?
Early or late modelyear? How many km shall be ok? What extras are needed? Which gearbox is used? And so on and so on ….
Here are my few findings.
The differences between 2003 and 2002 models are those:
- 2002 gearbox has wider wheels – better for sidecar usage
- 2002 has one spark plug per cylinder, 2003 has two
- Removal of ABS-II in 2002 does not require new front-mainbrakeunit, neither new brakes
On 24Apr, the decision was made: It will be a R1150GSA - MY02
Additional thoughts from 23Jan13: I think it would have been easier and cheaper to get a R1150GS from Finland and take the Touratech 40l fuel tank (I really missed that). The Adventure 30l tank is not that big for a sidecar. The front fork was replaced and the rear suspension changed. In the end, I think all "Adventure" advantages were either removed or not advantage enough.
And some more thoughts from last week: The GS might only have a 40A generator, the GSA has always 50A version. The GS does not come with a GAN - gearbox. If a GS gearbox is used, the difference from short first gear to normal second gear might be rather big. With a GAN gearbox and long sixth gear, the difference between fifth and sixth gear is more manageable. So GSA was a good decision after all.
Some thoughts on the transmission ratio
The transmission ration appears crucial on such a journey - there are mountains to climb and rough terrain to be mastered and I might get stuck with the sidecar. Also fuel consumption needs to be watched. One advice which made sense to me was that the ratio can never be short enough. I decided to go with the GAN gearbox (short first gear), in combination with a rear-axle-drive from the R850GS (ratio 37/11 part number: 33112330973 or 33112330974 with ABS). The change from 150/70R17 to 175/75R15 has no impact to the ratio. In order to reduce fuel consumption, I change the sixth gear from the original short to a long version (The long/normal sixth gear is standard in other GS gearboxes).
The transmission ration appears crucial on such a journey - there are mountains to climb and rough terrain to be mastered and I might get stuck with the sidecar. Also fuel consumption needs to be watched. One advice which made sense to me was that the ratio can never be short enough. I decided to go with the GAN gearbox (short first gear), in combination with a rear-axle-drive from the R850GS (ratio 37/11 part number: 33112330973 or 33112330974 with ABS). The change from 150/70R17 to 175/75R15 has no impact to the ratio. In order to reduce fuel consumption, I change the sixth gear from the original short to a long version (The long/normal sixth gear is standard in other GS gearboxes).
In hindsight, the change towards the 850GS rear axle drive was an excellent decision. I recommend this for anybody who wants to go offroad with this monster. Also the change of the sixth gear had a significant impact on the fuel consumption.
Strengthen the rear support frame
The subframe at the GSA is known for its weakness and the internet offers several ideas what and where to strengthen the frame. I went to a local welding shop and they welded some extra support pieces to the rear frame. Of course I forgot the sample pics at home and my explanation what to do was a little vague with the result that the two pieces in the most front part collided with the air filter housing. So I flexed them away and it was fine :)
After one ride in lousy weather, the frame started to rust badly. I realized my selfpainting attempt did not succeed. I needed to take it to a real paint shop.
Strengthen the rear support frame
The subframe at the GSA is known for its weakness and the internet offers several ideas what and where to strengthen the frame. I went to a local welding shop and they welded some extra support pieces to the rear frame. Of course I forgot the sample pics at home and my explanation what to do was a little vague with the result that the two pieces in the most front part collided with the air filter housing. So I flexed them away and it was fine :)
R1150GSA strengthen sub frame to avoid bending |
R1150GSA strengthen sub frame |
The next decisions - which boat and where to built it?
I looked at the following boats: Stern - RX overland, EZS Rally XC (maybe EZS Rally XC, Mobec ZeroGTO) and then it came: Mobec Enduro Cross - seemed perfect for our purpose :)
Mobec Enduro Cross and Zarges Alu box - could look like this... |
Back to the sidecar. Of course the Mobec boat needed a few modifications since we do not have a human passenger. Instead there will be three sweet little dogs and a need for plenty of storage room.
Sidecar frame |
One 10l reserve canister could fit here? |
sidecar mounted on frame |
Shortened boat and alu cases behind |
Bringing the bike and first rough alignment |
Bike with sidecar frame |
Almost ready... only the boat is missing |
The new extra-heavy-duty front fork |
Done... well almost :D |
During the long Finnish winter... planning continues as well as some other modifications like the rear-axle-drive, Xenon lights, day-driving lights, clutch, gearbox etc.
The winch could fit here...
In meantime the bike looked like this:
Bike during winter maintenance |
Modifications - part I
Occasionally small mistakes (at least in the eye of the customer) might happen like these two:
1. One trouble spot - the alu case lid does not open much |
With all those items and a few small other ones (mounting the winch, improving the rear suspension), we went again to Müller Gespanne and stayed for almost two weeks there in order to fix them (It took so long because the frame required re-painting). On the way to there, I noticed that our belts, which hold the big alu cases are not of good quality, so I got some proper ones for professional use (see also some earlier post).
Top view, finally found another place for drinking water |
SilberWolf from front - ready to go |
... and from the back - quite loaded ;) |
Our precious cargo - three little monsters :D |
Modifications - part II
Since I met Skippy again in Neumünster (she was there for her black belt exam), I decided to pop by Müller Gespanne again. The sidecar wheel did look a little bit out of line. Peter and Elsbeth told, that the load is quite heavy and in the end, we decided to change the spring at the sidecar suspension. They also noted that the rear suspension seemed not to be able to hold the load either and suggested to visit the firm which has done the rear suspension. So, off we went to visit a little town close to the dutch border.
Modifications - part III
Trying to fit the new shock... |
The same procedure again... |
I was not happy since I did not want to spend time this way and I had a feeling of wasting my time with this stuff.
On a positive note, I must say that this was exactly the reason why we decided to tour first through Europe and not go straight to Africa: to drive around and remove the "Kinderkrankheiten" of our SilberWolf :D
~ Wolfi
Thank you for the great post,It is really a big help.thanks for sharing nice blog
ReplyDeletePlease ask if you have further questions, now after riding for 1000+days and crossing Latin America I have a few specific ideas how to do things different.
DeleteHello.
ReplyDeleteI am from the uk and looking to follow a similar path to yourself.
I have 3 dogs and would enjoy taking them with me on trips.
After all your experience with the rig. Would you choose the same bike and sidecar again??
I would enjoy having a human passenger as well as canine ones. So could not modify the sidecar to the same degree as yourself.
Does the shaft drive make life easier for you as a shaft/bearings etc are quite difficult to replace when they go wrong compared to a chain.
What are your thoughts.
Thank you.
Kind regards
Howdy, taking dogs with is a different kind of travel and to me much more rewarding :) Anytime again with the dogs.
DeletePlenty of questions, so let me tackle them one by one:
Would you choose the same bike and sidecar again??
No, the BMW is not made for such heavy roads. I assume no off-the-shelf bike is (even solo off-road bikes disintegrated on those roads). So problem areas with BMW: paralever (assume full final drive overhaul/replacement after 60tkm), telelever: not made for the load (built a custom one). BMW HES, gearbox, starter motor were other trouble makers.
Sidecar and boat were great, no issues.
Human & dogs. Of course the passenger could sit behind you and the dogs in the sidecar. Passenger could sit in a trailer, dogs in the sidecar ;) or then make the boat longer. I had before a 1,5person boat in which a kid could sit in the sidecar behind the adult. Anyway, you will need to travel light or with a trailer (=> reliabilty?)
I prefer shaft over chain, but no paralever. See construction of Ural, old BMWs, Honda?, Guzzi?
I hope this helps :)
Send some pics of what you did
Cheers
Wolfi
Fantastic blog you have here! Thank you for posting such detailed descriptions of your sidecar outfit. I've been looking everywhere for inspiration for a new sidecar that I want to build and your design totally nailed it! I want to build an upgrade to my current sidecar (an old russian sidecar that is poorly fitted to my BSA A10) so that my dog can travel in relative comfort in all weather. The only thing that I am having difficulty with is selecting a suitable wheel system (swingarm, suspension, etc) for the sidecar that is in keeping with the age of the motorcycle i.e. 1950 = spoked wheel!. Nonetheless, the information and pictures that you have provided has been priceless! Many thanks and keep on riding ;)
ReplyDeleteHi Cai, thanks for the flowers. I am glad to hear that you can make some use out of what I was writing here :) Please check also the repair history :D and my blog about the rear wheel drive bearing ;)
DeleteLet me know if you have any further questions.
have fun and good luck with your rig
Wolfi
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete